JRAPOCALYPSE said:

Sounds cool! I agree that rs1 was more a test to see how the system was going to reflect and to see how their game (which was good for a launch on a totally new and different system) would sell. On that note anyone who says rs1 is bad should just go play with speak and spell, maybe you'll actually learn something about the game industry.

brinkofhumor said:

*grasps hands and gets on his knees and looks at the heavens* Please may this mean that Red Steel 2 doesn't suck complete ass.

YoshLee said:

I'm for sure getting Red Steel 2. The original one was pretty fun, although I admit the motion sensing could have been better, but now hearing this the shooting system is bound to be much improved.

Nintendoof said:

This might make me buy this game.

7

Shadow said:

I think that is Ubisoft's way of saying they screwed up with red steel one. Like most games, good concept, bad execution.

wiiboy101 said:

Ubisoft requires a wii motionplus add-on to do what everyone else can do without it. I'm not interested in anything ubisoft, they're liars. Everything they put on Wii is low budget 3rd rate rubbish or overly casual.

Monkeylemur said:

I thought the red steel 1 sucked, huh. I guess it was because of the motion right? I guess they pretty much took care of that problem.

B Darius said:

How can the Red Steel brand be strong when they only released 1 game? And no one liked it.

Dox said:

I think that the first red steel proved that there is a difference between a "good" game and a "fun" one. Hopefully, #2 will be both.

Diddy Kong Lover said:

This game proves if Ubisoft really likes Wii. If it's good it's like Capcom, otherwise it's a faker like Valve. Red Suck was simply a test.

Ninja Nico said:

I know that the first game was a launch game and was really just a test of the wii's shooter capabilities, but it is still a great game. I hope they use the motion plus to give the game its full potential. And put in a swordfighting multiplayer!